- Racism or ignorance?
- Fighting for Your African American Marriage - AbeBooks:
Those chafing at social change in the post-emancipation South saw Black marriages as a challenge to social order and racial hierarchy. It has only been fifty-one years since Loving v. Slaveholders regularly split up couples, overrode the parenting decisions of enslaved mothers and fathers, and sexually abused their human property with no fear of punishment.
Slaveholders went as far as espousing the idea that African Americans were unable to make family attachments , that Black parents had little regard for their children, and that white slaveholders acted in a parental role in the lives of their slaves. This paternalistic myth of kind slaveholders and childlike slaves remained embedded in early representations and histories of American Slavery into the early twentieth century.
Kinship was essential to Black people and many free and enslaved people valued marriage as a way to signify commitment and love.
Marriage was a way to codify intimate relationships. However, it was also an expression of humanity. It was a right that could confer other rights, and it was an instrument of social control. The couples who jumped brooms, rushed to Union camps, or searched for each other in the chaos of the postbellum South thought marriage was important, not perfect. Hunter juxtaposes the ways that African Americans practiced family formation, kinship making, and marriage with how the state, officials, and African Americans shaped marriage as a legal and civil institution.
The first three chapters of the book consider marriage during slavery. Hunter challenges readers to acknowledge the multiple family formations and couplings that enslaved people chose and maintained. In all three chapters Hunter centers Black family formations. African Americans formed families and adopted people into their kinship networks despite white disregard. Also, they affirmed their humanity among each other in spite of the violence, rape, abuse, and looming specter of separation through the internal slave trade.
While missionaries, the US government, and freedmen seemed to agree upon the importance of marriage as an institution, these marriages also exposed deep cultural and social fissures between all three groups. Significantly, legal marriage came with a legally enforced patriarchal family structure under which some former slaves did not wish to live. On both sides of the battle lines, Black marriage caused friction between legal and religious authorities because married independent freedmen with families did not readily serve white supremacy in theory or practice.
Instead, marriage conferred manhood on freedmen and slaves in ways that made many whites uncomfortable. Marriage and family structure, therefore, in the eyes of many, needed to be shaped and policed to benefit existing power structures based on racial hierarchy.
- FIGHTING FOR YOUR AFRICAN AMER;
- Difficulties Faced by Interracial Couples!
- America Wasn’t a Democracy, Until Black Americans Made It One.
- Storchenbiss: Roman (German Edition).
The final section of the book looks at Black marriages in the post-war period. While African Americans worked and hoped to reunite their families, whites in both the North and South wanted their support for heterosexual marriage and cohabiting nuclear families to help them control Black labor in the South. In a region decimated by the Civil War, Black labor remained essential to white wealth accumulation and survival.
White landowners, in particular, hoped that statutes like vagrancy laws, punishments like convict leasing , and debt peonage in the form of sharecropping would discipline a newly-free Black labor force. Hunter covers how each of these post-war institutions policed family formation, focusing on the ways in which whites frequently used violence to threaten family life.
Hunter looks at data about marriages among Black people in the period and surveys how family formations changed post-emancipation. Reconsider the relationship if rebellion is at the root of your decision to date across color lines.
Racism or ignorance?
Instead, Brenda repeatedly chooses black Christian men who are married or commitment-phobic and only sometimes professionally successful. Some racial groups may approve of men dating interracially but not women or vice versa. As the book progresses, the reader learns that Lindsey harbors considerable shame about being Chinese-American.
She finds the customs, food, and people largely repellent. Have a full-on discussion about it.samretscomlu.tk
Fighting for Your African American Marriage - AbeBooks:
If your partner finds members of her own racial group unattractive that reveals much about how she views herself and other groups as well. Interracial relationships, as all relationships do, pose their fair share of problems. But the tensions that arise from loving cross-racially can be overcome with good communication and by settling down with a partner who shares your principles. Share Flipboard Email. Government U.
Foreign Policy U. Liberal Politics U.
Table of Contents Expand. Interracial Relationships and Violence. The Fight for Interracial Marriage. Interracial Relationships and Rebellion. Are You Willing to Sacrifice? Examine Your Motives.
Dealing with Racial Fetishes. The Key to a Successful Relationship. Nadra Kareem Nittle has written about education, race, and cultural issues for a variety of publications including the Robert C. Maynard Institute for Journalism Education and Change. Are you mad?
I will never permit it. They said that Sula slept with white men All minds were closed to her when that word was passed around